Luke 15:11-32
The Parable of the Prodigal Son is
found in Luke chapter 15, verses 11-32. The main character in the parable, the
forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a
picture of God. In telling the story, Jesus identifies Himself with God in His
loving attitude to the lost. The younger son symbolizes the lost (Luke 15:1),
and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the Pharisees and
teachers, Luke 15:2). The major theme of this parable seems not to be so much
the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of Luke 15, but
rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the Father. In the
first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (Luke
15:1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his
son's return. We see a progression through the three parables from the
relationship of one in a hundred (Luke 15:1-7), to one in ten (Luke 15:8-10),
to one in one (Luke 15:11-32), demonstrating God’s love for each individual and
His personal attentiveness towards all humanity. We see in this story the
graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is
the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance
(Romans 2:4).
1. The word “Prodigal” does
not mean rebellious or lost—it means “wasteful” and “extravagant.” The word
origin refers to a person who is reckless and squanders their wealth.
2. The parable of the
Prodigal is the last of three parables Jesus shares about loss and
redemption—The Lost Sheep, The Lost Coin and The Lost Son—and it’s best read in
that context to understand the full force of Jesus’ narrative.
3. When the prodigal son
asked for his inheritance, it was like saying to his father, “I wish you
were dead.” It was a huge insult, weighted with shame and guilt.
4. In the Jewish culture at
this time, doing something like this would have likely cut you off from the
community forever. Moreover, being a part of the greater community was critical
for survival, health and overall quality of life.
5. In reality, the father would
have had to split up the land and sell a portion of his assets to give his son
the requested inheritance.
6. When the prodigal son
was done partying and found himself alone and hungry, he took a job feeding
slop to pigs. Why is this significant? In Jewish culture, pigs were
“unclean” animals. If a Jewish man longed for the food of pigs, it was
definitely hitting “rock bottom.”
7. The prodigal son decides
to head home, thinking that maybe his father would receive him as a servant.
This is proof that the son did not understand the depth of his father’s love
and compassion.
8. The prodigal son
rehearses a speech, but he never gets to use it.
9. When the father sees his
son return, he runs to greet him. Running in the Ancient Near Eastern culture
was taboo at that time. It required a man to pull up his tunic to his hips and
expose his legs (to keep from tripping). The practice was frowned upon and
typically brought shame and embarrassment.
10. If a Jewish son
squandered his money, giving it over to the Gentiles, he would have been cut
off from the community upon his return. The father likely ran to meet his son
to reach him before anyone else in the community had a chance to confront him.
The fact that the Father runs to receive him is scandalous and shocking and
goes against the cultural norm.
11. The father did not
scold the son but gave him a lavish welcome home party—calling for his servants
to prepare the fattened calf, a ring, a robe, and shoes. This is God’s stance
toward repentant sinners, and it is always bold, surprising and overflowing
with joy.
12. The father gave his son
a robe to restore his dignity in front of the community. No doubt,
the son was tattered and dirty from feeding slop to pigs and the father clothes
him as an act of love and compassion and to honor his son in full view of the
village.
13. The father also gave
the son a ring. Wearing rings during this time in history was a sign of
both wealth and position. The power of this symbol reflects the father’s
desire to restore his son as a family member and a respectable member of the
community—under the shadow of the father—once again.
14. Next, the father asked
his servants to get his son a pair of sandals. This, perhaps the most practical
gift, was a gesture that said, “I want you around for a while.” The
sandals prepared him to walk with the father without fear of cutting or soiling
his feet from the ground.
15. But there was one last
gift—the fattened calf. This kind of extravagant feast was reserved for
incredibly important occasions. No longer would his son settle for the pods of
pigs—he would now dine on the best meat available in the presence of his family
and, likely, everyone in the village.
16. The story has a part
two about the older son, that often is overlooked, but it is just as
important.
17. The older son
represented the Pharisees and scribes—they felt disrespected by God’s
scandalous grace to the sinner and the outcast. Besides, they have been keeping
the rules since day one—why didn’t they get a party?
18. The father’s response
to the older son? “All I have is yours too, but this requires a
celebration—my son was dead and now he’s alive again!” This is a great
picture of God’s stance to the self-righteous sinner—kind, direct, generous,
but still focused on the power of repentance.
19. The parable ends with
the refusal of the older brother to attend the feast. We do not know what
happened, but Jesus left the story hanging, open-ended for questions and
discussion, as he often does.
Who are you in this story? Are you a
prodigal, a Pharisee or a servant? Are you the rebellious son, lost and far
from God? Are you the self-righteous Pharisee, no longer capable of rejoicing
when a sinner returns to God?
Maybe you have hit rock bottom, come
to your senses and decided to run to God's open arms of compassion and mercy. On
the other hand, are you one of the servants in the household, rejoicing with
the father when a lost son finds his way home?
No comments:
Post a Comment